CVS update: openprivacy/htdocs/notes

From: cvs@openprivacy.org
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 18:49:18 PST

Date: Wednesday December 6, 19100 @ 18:49
Author: burton
CVSWEB Options: -------------------

Main CVSWeb: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi

View this module: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes

-----------------------------------

Update of /usr/local/cvsroot/openprivacy/htdocs/notes
In directory openprivacy.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10394

Modified Files:
        TODO
Log Message:
...

*****************************************************************
File: openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO

CVSWEB Options: -------------------

CVSWeb: Annotate this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO?annotate=1.5

CVSWeb: View this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

CVSWeb: Diff to previous version: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.4

-----------------------------------

Index: openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO
diff -u openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO:1.4 openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO:1.5
--- openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO:1.4 Tue Dec 5 19:33:47 2000
+++ openprivacy/htdocs/notes/TODO Wed Dec 6 18:49:17 2000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ********************************************************************************
-Last-Modified: $Date: 2000/12/06 03:33:47 $
-Version: $Id: TODO,v 1.4 2000/12/06 03:33:47 burton Exp $
+Last-Modified: $Date: 2000/12/07 02:49:17 $
+Version: $Id: TODO,v 1.5 2000/12/07 02:49:17 burton Exp $
 ********************************************************************************
 
 List of areas we need to define within OpenPrivacy... generally organized by
@@ -18,6 +18,26 @@
   describe themselves are standardized.
 
 
+- Wed Dec 6 18:44:05 2000 (burton): Need to go over reverse communications
+ protocol.
 
-
+ http://pix.comedia.com/OpenPrivacy/20000929/DSCN4685.JPG
 
+ The goal of this was so that a portal/remote agent could communicate back with
+ the initiating agent (sometimes the user) but only if there is an explicit
+ communications channel provided by the user.
+
+ This has to do with Agent communication. If a Primary Agent (Broker)
+ communicates with a Secondary Agent, the SA can potentially allow packets to
+ return back to the user as a payload.
+
+ - We need to use something like the Mojonation (referal) service.
+ - not really. If we use a referal but with an event based TCP alert this
+ can talk back to the client.
+
+- Wed Dec 6 18:41:49 2000 (burton): We need to have a mechanism to query/modify
+a set of static profiles. - set a profile (add/remove) - graft on profile info
+(add/remove) - we need a way to build up reputations... - need a way to query
+the profile (XQL based on a profile markup???) - need a way to report
+results... this may not be on a virtual circuit... should we use a messaging
+mechanism for this?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:52:14 PST