CVS update: openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations

From: cvs@openprivacy.org
Date: Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:14:34 PST

Date: Monday January 8, 19101 @ 2:14
Author: fen
CVSWEB Options: -------------------

Main CVSWeb: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi

View this module: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations

-----------------------------------

Update of /usr/local/cvsroot/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations
In directory openprivacy.org:/home/fen/projects/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations

Modified Files:
        survey.shtml
Log Message:
finished first pass at reviews - still need to read more on Free Haven...

*****************************************************************
File: openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml

CVSWEB Options: -------------------

CVSWeb: Annotate this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml?annotate=1.3

CVSWeb: View this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml?rev=1.3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

CVSWeb: Diff to previous version: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml.diff?r1=1.3&r2=1.2

-----------------------------------

Index: openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml
diff -u openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml:1.2 openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml:1.3
--- openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml:1.2 Sun Jan 7 18:18:28 2001
+++ openprivacy/htdocs/notes/reputations/survey.shtml Mon Jan 8 02:14:34 2001
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/includes/top.html"-->
 <!--#include virtual="/includes/navigation.html"-->
-<!-- $Id: survey.shtml,v 1.2 2001/01/08 02:18:28 fen Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Id: survey.shtml,v 1.3 2001/01/08 10:14:34 fen Exp $ -->
 
 <h2>Survey of Trust Metrics</h2>
 
@@ -74,6 +74,14 @@
 enhanced through performing transactions publicly (see <i>A Reputation
 System to Increase MIX-net Reliability</i>, section 3).
 
+<p>
+
+<font color="green">
+Of all the systems reviewed so far, Free Haven has the most comprehensive
+idea of what is needed in a reputation system. From what I can tell, they
+do not yet see its full power, though...
+</font>
+
 <p><hr><p>
 
 Freenet does not have reputations in any explicit manner. However,
@@ -89,6 +97,16 @@
 - assets remains to be seen.
 
 <p><hr><p>
+
+Slashdot uses a set of semi-randomly picked moderators who can give karma
+points (both positive and negative) to posts. One problem that regularly
+appears is people posting under names similar to a highly-regarded name to
+confuse the moderators. A system of authentication and pet names could
+alleviate this problem...
+
+<p><hr><p>
+
+Sourceforge has a peer rating system based on concepts from Advogato.
 
 <!--#include virtual="/includes/bottom.html"-->
 

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:52:14 PST