From: cvs@openprivacy.orgCVS update: sierra/docs
Date: Friday March 16, 19101 @ 1:11
Author: burton
CVSWEB Options: -------------------
Main CVSWeb: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi
View this module: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/sierra/docs
-----------------------------------
Update of /usr/local/cvs/public/sierra/docs
In directory giga:/tmp/cvs-serv7971/docs
Modified Files:
TODO TODO.bugzilla
Log Message:
signing now only takes a canonicalization. all repuations are added because the time changes on thier install
*****************************************************************
File: sierra/docs/TODO
CVSWEB Options: -------------------
CVSWeb: Annotate this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/sierra/docs/TODO?annotate=1.69
CVSWeb: View this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/sierra/docs/TODO?rev=1.69&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
CVSWeb: Diff to previous version: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/sierra/docs/TODO.diff?r1=1.69&r2=1.68
-----------------------------------
Index: sierra/docs/TODO
diff -u sierra/docs/TODO:1.68 sierra/docs/TODO:1.69
--- sierra/docs/TODO:1.68 Wed Mar 7 22:29:09 2001
+++ sierra/docs/TODO Fri Mar 16 01:11:49 2001
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
********************************************************************************
-*** Last-Modified: $Date: 2001/03/08 06:29:09 $
-*** Version: $Id: TODO,v 1.68 2001/03/08 06:29:09 burton Exp $
+*** Last-Modified: $Date: 2001/03/16 09:11:49 $
+*** Version: $Id: TODO,v 1.69 2001/03/16 09:11:49 burton Exp $
*** Author: Kevin A. Burton ( burton@apache.org | burton@openprivacy.org )
********************************************************************************
@@ -35,42 +35,6 @@
TODO:
-
-
- - Use Case 5: Reputation Calculation Engines can have "sub-engines" or
- Calculation Engines. If the RCEContext specificies a different J... Make
- sure to return the correct Bias RCE.
-
- - MeanRCE should become WeightedRCE. This would provide the same functionlity
- as a MeanRCE (by having all opinions as the same weight). The added
- functionaly would that you could change the vote metric that each J has. A
- good example of this would be that anything that "Fen" says counts as 5
- votes in the ontology of "Privacy".
-
- - RSA authentication with public private key pairs and working signatures.
- - requires nym management.
-
- - CompositeRCE functionality
- - URL forwarding
- - Ontology forwarding
- - Bias forwarding.
- - RCE Nesting via
- - cost? $$
-
- - Need to create a CompositeRCE component that held other RCEs and used each one
- intelligently.
-
- This could potentially be the default way that a Reputation server is used and
- it would be configured to use the correct RCE (remote or local).
-
-- Need to be able to fetch the reputation value for a reputation:// URI. is
- called on an object with a reputation:// URI where the SERVER is
- specified... use a Remote object for this. IE:
- reputation://www.slashdot.org/PUBKEY we would forward this to a SOAPClientRCE
- which would have to point to slashdot. This should always return the ACTUAL
- VALUE of this object via the query() mechanism. It is important to note that
- getReputation will return the calculated reputation for this pointer and not
- the actual value.
- determine the correct RCE by the type of URI requested. This should allow the
the administrator (and the object) to deploy the RCE and add some regexps
*****************************************************************
File: sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla
CVSWEB Options: -------------------
CVSWeb: Annotate this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla?annotate=1.12
CVSWeb: View this file: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla?rev=1.12&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
CVSWeb: Diff to previous version: http://openprivacy.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla.diff?r1=1.12&r2=1.11
-----------------------------------
Index: sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla
diff -u sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla:1.11 sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla:1.12
--- sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla:1.11 Wed Mar 14 21:51:19 2001
+++ sierra/docs/TODO.bugzilla Fri Mar 16 01:11:49 2001
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
# Add-URL: http://bugzilla.openprivacy.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Sierra
# Base-URL: http://bugzilla.openprivacy.org/
# Author: Kevin A. Burton ( burton@apache.org | burton@openprivacy.org )
-# Last-modified: Wed Mar 14 18:47:48 2001
-# Version: $Id: TODO.bugzilla,v 1.11 2001/03/15 05:51:19 burton Exp $
+# Last-modified: Thu Mar 15 12:02:07 2001
+# Version: $Id: TODO.bugzilla,v 1.12 2001/03/16 09:11:49 burton Exp $
# Protocol-version: 1.0.2
# Commentary:
#
@@ -321,10 +321,10 @@
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-ID: 23
-Short Description: migrate all talon.components packages into talon.components
- packages.
-Edit URL: http://bugzilla.openprivacy.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23
+ID: 24
+Short Description: The NymFunctionProxy component should not sign() or encrypt()
+ objects.
+Edit URL: http://bugzilla.openprivacy.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24
Product: Sierra
Version: 0.5.0
Platform: PC
@@ -342,7 +342,44 @@
Status Whiteboard:
keywords:
Description:
-This migration has already been done under Talon. Need to do it under Sierra too.
+This should be replaced with a mechanism so that this produces reliable
+input/output.
+
+sign() should only sign an canonicalization. encrypt() should take a
+marsha/unmarshal mechanism so that we can serialize an object and then encrypt
+that.
+
+
+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ID: 25
+Short Description: MeanRCE should become WeightedRCE
+Edit URL: http://bugzilla.openprivacy.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
+Product: Sierra
+Version: 0.5.0
+Platform: PC
+Operating System: Linux
+Status: NEW
+Severity: critical
+Priority: P2
+Resolution:
+Assigned: burton@relativity.yi.org
+Reporter: burton@relativity.yi.org
+Component: Default
+URL:
+Target Milestone: ---
+QA Contact: 0
+Status Whiteboard:
+keywords:
+Description:
+- MeanRCE should become WeightedRCE. This would provide the same functionlity
+ as a MeanRCE (by having all opinions as the same weight). The added
+ functionaly would that you could change the vote metric that each J has. A
+ good example of this would be that anything that "Fen" says counts as 5
+ votes in the ontology of "Privacy".
+
+ - this is needed because without this we really can't calculate reputations.
+ We need at least one solid RCE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Mar 16 2001 - 01:11:55 PST